External perimeter
Mapping and validation of internet-exposed assets, including ports, services, admin panels, technologies in use and secrets potentially leaked in public repositories.
Pentest · 01 · service
Finding it firstbefore it becomes an incidentis the job.
We run deep technical tests within a controlled scope, identifying exploitable vulnerabilities, validating real impact and guiding remediation with clear evidence. No dressed-up scanner report posing as consultancy.
Tailored to your environment.
Every infrastructure has its own surfaces, risks and particularities. We define scope together with the client, agree on the prior-knowledge level — white, grey or black box — and run the assessment with an adversarial approach, documented exploitation, technical evidence and a record of executed actions.
Surfaces we can cover in a Pentest
The final composition depends on the agreed scope, the assets involved and the goals of the test.
Web applications
Assessment of portals, dashboards, blogs, e-commerce and corporate systems, with coverage based on OWASP Top 10, ASVS and business-logic flaws.
Mobile applications
Static and dynamic analysis of Android and iOS applications, covering local storage, backend communication, hardcoded secrets, control bypass and root or jailbreak detection.
REST and GraphQL APIs
Assessment of integration interfaces focused on data exposure, access control, validations, business rules and abuse scenarios. The goal is to identify technical and logical flaws that allow improper access, object manipulation or impact on connected systems.
Internal environment, assumed breach
Assessment of the internal network considering a scenario where the attacker already obtained initial access. The goal is to identify how far it would be possible to go, which controls could be bypassed and which internal exposures increase the impact of an intrusion.
Wireless
Assessment of corporate wireless networks to identify authentication weaknesses, improper exposure between networks, inadequate client isolation and risks associated with nearby devices or technologies.
Cloud, AWS, Azure and GCP
Assessment of cloud environments to identify insecure configurations, excessive permissions, publicly exposed resources, credential exposure and paths that may allow improper access between services or accounts.
Code review
Risk-oriented analysis of critical sections of the application, focused on flaws that can compromise authentication, authorization, handling of sensitive data, file manipulation and safe execution of features.
How we run the engagement
From initial alignment to retest, every step is documented, controlled and oriented toward proving real impact.
01step
Pre-engagement
We define scope, formal authorizations, execution windows, restrictions, emergency contacts and communication rules. Everything aligned before any technical activity.
02step
Reconnaissance
We map the attack surface through active and passive sources, identifying assets, technologies, services, endpoints, authentication flows and possible exposure points.
03step
Exploitation
We manually validate the identified hypotheses. When an exploitable vector exists, we demonstrate impact in a controlled, documented manner within the approved scope.
04step
Post-exploitation
We assess what would be reachable after initial exploitation, always respecting the defined limits. Evidence is collected minimally, safely and only enough to prove the risk.
05step
Reporting
We deliver an executive and technical report with evidence, exploitation context, severity, impact, remediation recommendations and clear prioritization guidance.
06step
Retest
After remediation, we reassess the reported vectors to confirm whether the flaws were actually mitigated and update the closing status.
Why it matters
benefício
Actionable findings
Every vulnerability ships with documented exploitation, payload and steps. Devs fix without needing a translator.
benefício
Zero false positives
Manually validated. Only what's actually exploitable makes the report.
benefício
Calibrated severity
CVSS 3.1 plus your environment context. Critical in our report is critical for real.
benefício
Retest included
After remediation, we come back and confirm the vector closed.
benefício
Audit-friendly
Reports work for SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, GDPR-like frameworks and similar.
benefício
No noise to operations
Windows are agreed. You don't wake up to prod being down.
FAQ
An automated scan identifies indicators and broadens visibility over possible exposures, but tends to generate noise and false positives. An audit assesses adherence to controls, policies and compliance requirements. A Pentest manually validates, in practice, whether a vulnerability is exploitable and what impact it can cause. The three approaches complement each other, but a Pentest shows more clearly what an attacker could actually do in a real scenario.
Want to understand what's exposed on your perimeter?
Tell us in a few lines what the environment is and the goal of the test. We'll come back with a scope proposal, estimated timeline and next steps.