Initial access
Validation of entry vectors such as targeted phishing, controlled payloads, abuse of exposed services, leaked credentials and other paths compatible with the defined scenario.
Multi-vector operation based on TTPs used by current threat actors. The goal isn't just to find vulnerabilities, but to validate whether the organization can detect, respond to and contain a realistic intrusion attempt.
A Red Team operation starts quietly, with passive reconnaissance, OSINT and mapping of people, technologies, processes and public exposures. From the defined scenario, we run controlled attack vectors such as phishing, exploitation of exposed assets, social engineering, physical access or supply chain simulations — always within the approved scope. The goal is to validate the full chain: initial access, persistence, lateral movement, privilege escalation and simulated exfiltration, while defensive controls are assessed under conditions close to a real attack.
Validation of entry vectors such as targeted phishing, controlled payloads, abuse of exposed services, leaked credentials and other paths compatible with the defined scenario.
Each executed technique is mapped against MITRE ATT&CK, allowing us to identify what triggered an alert, what passed unnoticed and where visibility gaps exist.
Controlled attempt to reach critical assets such as personal data, secrets, intellectual property, production environments or systems essential to the business.
Realistic phishing, vishing, smishing campaigns and physical interactions when included in scope, with a controlled approach and clear safety criteria.
Assessment of paths for persistence, credential abuse, privilege escalation and movement between segments, systems and identities.
Controlled demonstration of the possibility of data exit, without exfiltrating real information, validating the effectiveness of controls such as DLP, SIEM, EDR and response processes.
Assessment of paths to elevate permissions from initial access, exploring misconfigurations, credential abuse, excessive permissions and trust relationships between systems, users and domains.
Controlled simulation of communication between the compromised environment and the operation's infrastructure, validating whether proxies, EDR, SIEM, firewall, DNS and other controls can identify or block suspicious channels.
We define which adversary profiles make sense for the organization's context, considering sector, exposure, critical assets, motivation and expected technical capability.
We run passive OSINT to map technologies, people, processes, public exposures, connected third parties and possible entry vectors.
We execute the vector approved in scope, such as phishing, abuse of external exposure, social engineering, physical access or supply chain simulation.
We assess persistence, privilege escalation and lateral movement, with every action logged, controlled and mapped against MITRE ATT&CK.
We try to reach the previously agreed target — a critical system, sensitive data, business process or strategic environment — always with controlled demonstration and no real exfiltration.
We run a joint session with the involved teams, presenting the operation timeline, executed techniques, observed detections and improvement recommendations.
You learn whether the SOC detects, responds and escalates events within the expected time, before that's validated by a real incident.
It becomes clear which techniques were detected, which slipped by, which triggered late alerts, and where the controls need to evolve.
The defensive team follows a realistic operation, understands adversary behavior and turns each stage into improvements in detection and response.
The operation is built on threats relevant to the business, avoiding generic simulations disconnected from the organization's reality.
Indicators like MTTD, MTTR, detection rate by technique and coverage by TTP help translate the operation into data useful for leadership and governance.
Instead of assuming the security stack works, the organization observes how its controls behave during a controlled intrusion.
No. Pentest offers broader technical coverage of vulnerabilities on defined assets. Red Team assesses the organization's ability to detect, respond to and contain a realistic attack chain. In mature environments, the two approaches complement each other.
Describe the environment, the main assets and what worries your team the most. We'll come back with a suggested scenario, scope, estimated timeline and proposal.